Endava vs ELEKS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of ELEKS (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. ELEKS is the stronger option for UK enterprise buyers wanting three and a half decades of delivery history. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs ELEKS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1991 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | Longest continuous operating history on this list, delivered within easy UK working-hours overlap |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Fixed-scope and dedicated-team enterprise engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services |
Endava vs ELEKS: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
ELEKS
Lviv sits one to two hours ahead of UK time depending on the season, close enough for a full overlapping working day, which matters for ELEKS specifically given the company has been running continuously from there since 1991, a year before Ukraine declared independence. That three-and-a-half-decade history has produced a deep healthcare, insurance, and fintech track record and a stable, senior-heavy delivery process. Its public positioning leans on decades of history more than any single sharp technical specialty.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs ELEKS
| Capability | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Framework / platform | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Criterion | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Dimension | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system., A buyer wanting real-time collaboration during UK working hours without a large timezone gap. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs ELEKS: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| ELEKS | |
|---|---|
| + | Longest operating history of any company on this list, since 1991. |
| + | One-to-two-hour timezone gap with the UK, close enough for full working-day overlap. |
| + | Deep, verified healthcare and insurance regulatory experience. |
| - | Broad enterprise-consultancy positioning rather than one sharply named technical specialty |
| - | No dedicated UK office, unlike Ciklum or Endava on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose ELEKS?
A typical fit: a UK insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system.
Longest continuous operating history on this list, delivered within easy UK working-hours overlap. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Endava vs ELEKS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs ELEKS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs ELEKS
| Use case | Endava fit | ELEKS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting real-time collaboration during UK working hours without a large timezone gap. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs ELEKS
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
ELEKS (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting real-time collaboration during UK working hours without a large timezone gap. If your situation matches that, ELEKS is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs ELEKS FAQ
Is Endava better than ELEKS?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. ELEKS's strongest advantage: longest operating history of any company on this list, since 1991.
How do Endava and ELEKS differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. ELEKS uses fixed-scope and dedicated-team enterprise engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or ELEKS?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and ELEKS?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. ELEKS's primary differentiator is: longest continuous operating history on this list, delivered within easy UK working-hours overlap. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Healthcare, Insurance).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.