Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.3/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for UK hardware and IoT product companies needing embedded plus cloud under one roof. Endava is the stronger option for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (additional offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 200+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.9 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A London office and Central European timezone overlap paired with genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices |
| Pricing model | Flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | C/C++, FreeRTOS, Zephyr | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions runs its engineering out of Lviv, Ukraine, with additional offices in Hamburg, London, and Kraków, all comfortably within a one-to-two-hour window of UK working hours. Founded in 2007, the roughly 200-person team specializes in firmware, embedded Linux, and electrical engineering, wrapped in a broader Cloud, Data & AI, and Digital practice, so a UK buyer building a connected medical device or industrial IoT platform gets electronics through cloud from one vendor. Clients include Astronics, Caltech, Ferno, Cellink, and Bosch Rexroth, and the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification alongside direct partnership tiers with NXP, STMicroelectronics, and Microchip.
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✗ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| .NET | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Team extension, Dedicated team, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Automotive, Energy | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A UK medtech company needing firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together., A UK industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | A London office gives UK buyers a local point of contact alongside the Lviv engineering base. |
| + | Genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth that generalist UK-facing outsourcing vendors rarely staff for. |
| + | 360° coverage from electronics through cloud and AI under one vendor. |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification, relevant to UK data-protection due diligence. |
| + | Full intellectual property and source code transfer on every engagement. |
| - | Narrower fit for a UK buyer who just wants a standard web or mobile application with no hardware component |
| - | Does not run mass production in-house, only development and ongoing maintenance |
| - | Does not obtain UK or EU regulatory certification on the client's behalf, only the technical documentation to support it |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a UK medtech company needing firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together.
A London office and Central European timezone overlap paired with genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Automotive, Energy, Transportation & logistics.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK medtech company needing firmware, electrical engineering, and a compliant cloud backend built together. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK industrial IoT product needing MCU driver work and secure OTA firmware updates. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Endava
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A London office and Central European timezone overlap paired with genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth.
Endava (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need a payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Endava FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Endava?
Lemberg Solutions (4.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: a London office gives UK buyers a local point of contact alongside the Lviv engineering base. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Endava differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses flexible engagement models: tech consulting, team extension/staff augmentation, or full project development, rather than one fixed template pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Endava?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Endava?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: a London office and Central European timezone overlap paired with genuine embedded and firmware engineering depth. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Automotive vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.