Endava vs 10Clouds: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of 10Clouds (3.6/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. 10Clouds is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting design-forward, mobile-first product development. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs 10Clouds: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | 10Clouds |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2009 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React Native, React, Node.js |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps |
Endava vs 10Clouds: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
10Clouds
10Clouds was founded in Warsaw, Poland in 2009 and has built a reputation for strong design culture layered onto mobile-first product development, serving international clients including UK businesses. Its EU headquarters gives it the same straightforward GDPR posture as its Polish peers on this list, useful for a UK buyer's data-processing agreements. Public information on its current team size is thinner than for some peers, so buyers should confirm current capacity directly.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Capability | Endava | 10Clouds |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✗ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Framework / platform | Endava | 10Clouds |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Criterion | Endava | 10Clouds |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Dimension | Endava | 10Clouds |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team., A startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs 10Clouds: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| 10Clouds | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong design culture combined with mobile-first product development. |
| + | EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data handling for UK clients. |
| + | Over fifteen years of continuous operation since 2009. |
| - | Public documentation of current team size is thinner than for more established peers (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| - | No dedicated UK office; contact runs through the Warsaw base |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose 10Clouds?
A typical fit: a UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team.
A design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, SaaS, Consumer apps.
Decision matrix: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs 10Clouds (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs 10Clouds
| Use case | Endava fit | 10Clouds fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK company wanting a design-led mobile product built by an EU-based team. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs 10Clouds
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
10Clouds (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need a startup that values design culture as much as raw engineering throughput. If your situation matches that, 10Clouds is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs 10Clouds FAQ
Is Endava better than 10Clouds?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. 10Clouds's strongest advantage: strong design culture combined with mobile-first product development.
How do Endava and 10Clouds differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. 10Clouds uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or 10Clouds?
10Clouds is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and 10Clouds?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. 10Clouds's primary differentiator is: a design-led, mobile-first product culture built over more than fifteen years. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 100–250 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Fintech, SaaS).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.