Endava vs Cleveroad: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Cleveroad (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Cleveroad is the stronger option for UK buyers wanting a physically staffed Manchester office. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Cleveroad: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2011 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | New York, USA / Manchester, UK (Kharkiv delivery center) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A genuine Manchester office, distinguishing it from peers that only sell into the UK market remotely |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, React Native, Node.js |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Retail, Logistics, Healthcare |
Endava vs Cleveroad: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Cleveroad
Cleveroad has hosted offices in New York, Los Angeles, Manchester, and Kharkiv since its 2011 founding, building general custom software and mobile apps for startups and mid-size businesses. That Manchester office is a genuine UK presence, distinguishing it from most of the peers on this list who only sell into the UK market without a physical local office. It competes primarily on general-purpose web and mobile delivery capacity rather than a named industry or technology niche.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Capability | Endava | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Framework / platform | Endava | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Criterion | Endava | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Dimension | Endava | Cleveroad |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Retail, Logistics, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK startup wanting an actual Manchester office as its point of contact., A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Cleveroad: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Cleveroad | |
|---|---|
| + | Genuine Manchester office, a real UK presence rather than remote sales coverage. |
| + | Multiple commercial offices in the US and UK give buyers a choice of contracting entity. |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operation since 2011. |
| - | General-purpose positioning without a clearly named technical specialization |
| - | Kharkiv is one of several offices rather than the company's sole delivery base |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Cleveroad?
A typical fit: a UK startup wanting an actual Manchester office as its point of contact.
A genuine Manchester office, distinguishing it from peers that only sell into the UK market remotely. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Logistics, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Cleveroad (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Cleveroad
| Use case | Endava fit | Cleveroad fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK startup wanting an actual Manchester office as its point of contact. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Cleveroad
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Cleveroad (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need a mid-market business needing general web or mobile software. If your situation matches that, Cleveroad is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Cleveroad FAQ
Is Endava better than Cleveroad?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Cleveroad's strongest advantage: genuine Manchester office, a real UK presence rather than remote sales coverage.
How do Endava and Cleveroad differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Cleveroad uses fixed-project and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Cleveroad?
Cleveroad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Cleveroad?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Cleveroad's primary differentiator is: a genuine Manchester office, distinguishing it from peers that only sell into the UK market remotely. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 150–300 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Retail, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.