Endava vs GlobalLogic: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of GlobalLogic (4.1/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. GlobalLogic is the stronger option for UK automotive and industrial clients wanting conglomerate-backed engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs GlobalLogic: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | GlobalLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2000 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Santa Clara, California, USA (owned by Hitachi; major Ukraine delivery centers in Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, and Mykolaiv) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 5,700+ in Ukraine (larger global headcount) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | Conglomerate-backed industrial and automotive relationships delivered from a large team that sits within UK working hours |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Enterprise dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, C++, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Automotive, Healthcare, Media & entertainment |
Endava vs GlobalLogic: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
GlobalLogic
Hitachi's roughly $9.6 billion acquisition of GlobalLogic in 2021 folded a Santa Clara-founded, Ukraine-heavy engineering workforce into a Japanese industrial conglomerate's supply chain. Founded in 2000, the company now runs roughly 5,700 engineers, out of a larger global headcount, from Kyiv, Kharkiv, Lviv, and Mykolaiv, cities that all sit close enough to UK time for genuine working-day overlap. Corporate structure under a large conglomerate does mean less direct founder-level access than a UK-facing boutique on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Capability | Endava | GlobalLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Framework / platform | Endava | GlobalLogic |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Criterion | Endava | GlobalLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Dimension | Endava | GlobalLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Automotive, Healthcare, Media & entertainment |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK automotive or industrial client wanting Hitachi's supply-chain relationships behind its partner., An enterprise needing engineering capacity across four Ukrainian cities at once. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs GlobalLogic: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| GlobalLogic | |
|---|---|
| + | Hitachi ownership brings industrial and automotive client relationships at conglomerate scale. |
| + | Large single Ukraine-based engineering workforce, within UK working-hours overlap. |
| + | Established digital-engineering practice for automotive, healthcare, and media clients. |
| - | Corporate structure under a large conglomerate means less direct founder-level access |
| - | No dedicated UK office, unlike Ciklum or Endava on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose GlobalLogic?
A typical fit: a UK automotive or industrial client wanting Hitachi's supply-chain relationships behind its partner.
Conglomerate-backed industrial and automotive relationships delivered from a large team that sits within UK working hours. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Healthcare, Media & entertainment.
Decision matrix: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs GlobalLogic (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs GlobalLogic
| Use case | Endava fit | GlobalLogic fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK automotive or industrial client wanting Hitachi's supply-chain relationships behind its partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise needing engineering capacity across four Ukrainian cities at once. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs GlobalLogic
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
GlobalLogic (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need an enterprise needing engineering capacity across four Ukrainian cities at once. If your situation matches that, GlobalLogic is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs GlobalLogic FAQ
Is Endava better than GlobalLogic?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. GlobalLogic's strongest advantage: hitachi ownership brings industrial and automotive client relationships at conglomerate scale.
How do Endava and GlobalLogic differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. GlobalLogic uses enterprise dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or GlobalLogic?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and GlobalLogic?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. GlobalLogic's primary differentiator is: conglomerate-backed industrial and automotive relationships delivered from a large team that sits within UK working hours. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 5,700+ in Ukraine (larger global headcount)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Automotive, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.