Endava vs Miquido: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Miquido (3.8/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Miquido is the stronger option for UK product companies wanting EU-based mobile and AI development. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Miquido: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Miquido |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2013 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Kraków, Poland |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 150+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A mobile and AI product specialization delivered from an EU-headquartered, GDPR-native team |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Swift, Kotlin, React Native |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Consumer apps, Fintech, Retail |
Endava vs Miquido: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Miquido
Miquido was founded in Kraków, Poland in 2013 and has grown to more than 150 engineers, designers, and product managers building mobile, web, and AI-powered products for international clients. Its EU headquarters gives it the same GDPR-native compliance posture as Netguru, relevant to any UK buyer handling personal data, while its size keeps it closer to founder-accessible than the mega-scale firms on this list. Mobile and AI product work is its actual specialty, a real focus rather than a generic full-stack label.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Miquido
| Capability | Endava | Miquido |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✗ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Miquido
| Framework / platform | Endava | Miquido |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Miquido
| Criterion | Endava | Miquido |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Miquido
| Dimension | Endava | Miquido |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Consumer apps, Fintech, Retail |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK company building a mobile app with an AI-powered feature., A product team wanting EU-native GDPR compliance for a mobile build. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Miquido: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Miquido | |
|---|---|
| + | EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data handling for UK clients. |
| + | A named mobile and AI product specialization, distinct from generic full-stack positioning. |
| + | Mid-size team gives closer access to senior product people than a large firm. |
| - | No dedicated UK office; contact runs through the Kraków base |
| - | Smaller team limits capacity for very large, multi-team programs |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Miquido?
A typical fit: a UK company building a mobile app with an AI-powered feature.
A mobile and AI product specialization delivered from an EU-headquartered, GDPR-native team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer apps, Fintech, Retail.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Miquido
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Miquido (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Miquido
| Use case | Endava fit | Miquido fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK company building a mobile app with an AI-powered feature. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A product team wanting EU-native GDPR compliance for a mobile build. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Miquido
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Miquido (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need a product team wanting EU-native GDPR compliance for a mobile build. If your situation matches that, Miquido is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Miquido FAQ
Is Endava better than Miquido?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Miquido's strongest advantage: EU headquarters simplifies GDPR-aligned data handling for UK clients.
How do Endava and Miquido differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Miquido uses dedicated-team and fixed-project engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Miquido?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Miquido?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Miquido's primary differentiator is: a mobile and AI product specialization delivered from an EU-headquartered, GDPR-native team. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Consumer apps, Fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.