Endava vs Sigma Software Group: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software Group (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Sigma Software Group is the stronger option for UK aerospace, automotive, and gaming clients wanting named domain engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Sigma Software Group: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Kharkiv-founded; group headquarters now spans multiple countries across roughly 40 offices |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 2,100+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A 40-office global network with real Western European delivery presence, anchored by named aerospace and gaming practices |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Consulting and dedicated-team engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Unity, C++, Java |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Aerospace, Gaming, Automotive, Fintech |
Endava vs Sigma Software Group: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Sigma Software Group
Five friends founded Sigma Software Group in Kharkiv in 2002; the company has since scaled to more than 2,100 professionals across roughly 40 offices worldwide, with its post-2022 expansion adding real Western European delivery presence alongside its original Ukrainian base. Named practices in aerospace, gaming, fintech, and automotive engineering give it a technical-consulting positioning UK buyers evaluating a specific vertical need can lean on. That same expansion means a buyer specifically wanting Ukraine-concentrated delivery should verify current team location directly.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Capability | Endava | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Framework / platform | Endava | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Node.js | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Criterion | Endava | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Dimension | Endava | Sigma Software Group |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Aerospace, Gaming, Automotive |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A UK aerospace or automotive client wanting named domain engineering rather than generic full-stack developers., A gaming studio needing a partner with a documented gaming practice. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs Sigma Software Group: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Sigma Software Group | |
|---|---|
| + | Named aerospace and gaming engineering practices, both rare specialties. |
| + | Global 40-office footprint spreads delivery risk across many countries, several in Western Europe. |
| + | Founder-led history stretching back to 2002. |
| - | Global expansion means Ukraine-specific delivery is not guaranteed for every engagement; confirm before signing |
| - | No dedicated UK office among its many international locations |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Sigma Software Group?
A typical fit: a UK aerospace or automotive client wanting named domain engineering rather than generic full-stack developers.
A 40-office global network with real Western European delivery presence, anchored by named aerospace and gaming practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Aerospace, Gaming, Automotive, Fintech.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Sigma Software Group (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
| Use case | Endava fit | Sigma Software Group fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A UK aerospace or automotive client wanting named domain engineering rather than generic full-stack developers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A gaming studio needing a partner with a documented gaming practice. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Sigma Software Group
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Sigma Software Group (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need a gaming studio needing a partner with a documented gaming practice. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software Group is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Sigma Software Group FAQ
Is Endava better than Sigma Software Group?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Sigma Software Group's strongest advantage: named aerospace and gaming engineering practices, both rare specialties.
How do Endava and Sigma Software Group differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Sigma Software Group uses consulting and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Sigma Software Group?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Sigma Software Group?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Sigma Software Group's primary differentiator is: a 40-office global network with real Western European delivery presence, anchored by named aerospace and gaming practices. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 2,100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Aerospace, Gaming).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.