Endava vs Tallium: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.3/5) edges ahead of Tallium (3.7/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for UK financial services firms wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered vendor. Tallium is the stronger option for UK buyers who want a real rate before the first sales call. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Tallium: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2012 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices | A published GoodFirms rate card, unmatched transparency among the companies reviewed on this UK-facing list |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Time & materials, published at $25-$49/hr per GoodFirms |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, Node.js, .NET |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Retail, Enterprise software |
Endava vs Tallium: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in London in 2000 and remains headquartered there today, now listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering primarily out of Central and Eastern European centers. That combination, UK incorporation with public-company financial transparency, is genuinely rare among the companies serving British buyers on this list. Named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology give it real depth in the financial services sector UK buyers frequently need.
Tallium
Every other company on this UK-facing list quotes engagements privately; Tallium, founded in Kyiv in 2012, simply posts its rate on GoodFirms instead: $25-$49 per hour, backed by a 5.0-star rating across more than 40 verified reviews. That transparency makes genuine cost comparison possible before a first call, a real advantage for a UK buyer sizing up a budget before committing to a discovery process. Its boutique scale suits single-team engagements rather than the multi-hundred-person programs a firm like SoftServe or Ciklum can staff.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Tallium
| Capability | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Custom build | ✗ | ✓ |
| Consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Framework / platform | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Node.js | N/A | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| .NET | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Criterion | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Dimension | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Retail, Enterprise software |
| Best use cases | A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner., A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | A cost-conscious UK buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing., A small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Time & materials |
Endava vs Tallium: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices relevant to UK financial services. |
| + | More than two decades of CEE delivery experience. |
| - | Mid-tier delivery capacity, smaller than the true mega-giants for very large programs |
| - | Premium pricing typical of a publicly listed, financial-services-focused vendor |
| Tallium | |
|---|---|
| + | Published hourly rate gives UK buyers real pricing transparency no other company on this list offers. |
| + | 5.0-star GoodFirms rating across more than 40 verified reviews at time of writing. |
| + | Kyiv timezone allows genuine UK working-day overlap. |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity to single-team engagements rather than enterprise-scale programs |
| - | No dedicated UK office among the companies on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner.
A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Tallium?
A typical fit: a cost-conscious UK buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing.
A published GoodFirms rate card, unmatched transparency among the companies reviewed on this UK-facing list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Enterprise software.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Tallium
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Tallium (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Tallium |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Tallium
| Use case | Endava fit | Tallium fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A UK bank or insurer wanting a publicly listed, London-headquartered technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments company needing named domain expertise rather than generalist development. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A cost-conscious UK buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Tallium
Endava (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Software Outsourcing (UK) projects. A publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices.
Tallium (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. If your situation matches that, Tallium is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Tallium FAQ
Is Endava better than Tallium?
Endava (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE and headquartered in London since founding. Tallium's strongest advantage: published hourly rate gives UK buyers real pricing transparency no other company on this list offers.
How do Endava and Tallium differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Tallium uses time & materials, published at $25-$49/hr per goodfirms pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Tallium?
Tallium is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Tallium?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly traded, London-headquartered company with named payments and banking technology practices. Tallium's primary differentiator is: a published GoodFirms rate card, unmatched transparency among the companies reviewed on this UK-facing list. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Retail, Enterprise software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.